There are a few questions about the republican primary race for Tulsa Mayor that are rattling around in my brain this morning at 1:30 am. This all started the other day, when I called in to the Pat Campbell show on KFAQ. He was asking people who they were voting for and why. I called in to say that I was voting for Chris Medlock, because he is the proven conservative, and because he is on the right side of all the issues that are important to me (see Medlock’s Issues page).
He asked me, “Do you really think Medlock can beat Tom Adelson?” (Adelson is widely regarded to be the front runner on the Democrat side)
Question 1
Can Medlock beat Adelson? The real question he was asking me was, since Medlock doesn’t have a lot of money(comparatively) do I really think he can win against Adelson? Another way of asking his question is, shouldn’t I vote for Bartlett since he has a lot of money?
Since I believe he is going to beat Dewey Jr, let me answer that with another question. If he can beat one Millionaire, why can’t he beat another one?
This leads me to the next question 2
Question 2
Despite all Bartlett's flaws, should I let my fears of the general election affect my choice in the primary? Alternatively, should I go a head and choose a lesser candidate because I think he might win in the General? Still another way; should I choose a candidate that is closer in position, wealth, and ideology to the opponent in the General election because it might somehow curry favor with those in the middle or with undecided voters?
Again, let me answer that with another question. How well did that line of thinking work out for us in the last presidential election? Abandoning our core beliefs and choosing the more “electable” candidate is precisely what earned President Obama the win. I’ll not repeat that mistake in the Tulsa Mayoral election.
Question 3
Question 2, leads me to Question 3 which I leave you to answer for yourself.
From where I sit, Adelson and Bartlett Jr are not that much different. Given that Adelson has already beat Bartlett once before in the race for State Senate, what makes you think that given the choice between the two, voters won't make the same choice again?
Given Bartlett’s predilection of being a republican pretender, and a democrat supporter, it seems like the choice would be between a wolf and a wolf in sheep’s clothing and I’d rather just take the wolf. From the other perspective, given the choice between a liberal, and a liberal pretending to be a republican, I assume that most liberals would rather just vote for the real thing. I further assume that most conservatives would probably just vote for the independent given those two choices.
This is ironic because, according to Pat Campbell’s logic, we should choose Bartlett because he is the only one who can beat Adelson, when in fact the opposite is true.
Question 4
Question 4 is unrelated to the other 3, but it is bouncing around my head none-the-less.
Sometimes, I like to think by blog has more influence that it really does, but I know that in reality it is of little consequence. Michael Bates on the other hand is the grand-daddy of all Tulsa Bloggers. A link from his blog to yours is worth pure gold in the local blogosphere.
Even still, when most people get their news from the Tulsa World or from TV, why would Bartlett choose to bring so much attention to Bates by having his divorce records sealed after Bates had already blogged about it? His actions have lead to more scrutiny over his divorce, even leading to a Tulsa World article on the matter. Why not just leave it alone? Seems stupid to me, but thankfully I'm not Dewey Bartlett Jr...so what do I know?
Pondering these questions, at now 2:30am, removes all the questions in my mind as to whether or not Medlock is the right choice for the Republican nomination of Tulsa’s Mayor. No Mr. Campbell, on September 8th, I’m not going to vote for Dewey Jr. I am going to vote Chris Medlock.